Law & Politics

Wednesday’s United Nations General Assembly session saw not one, not two, but three Latin American heads of state call on it to promote debate on alternatives to the war on drugs. The presidents of Colombia, Guatemala, and Mexico all called for exploring new paths.

Otto_Perez_Molina_2007_1 UN Drug Policy Debate, Source: http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2012/sep/26/latin_americans_un_seek_drug_pol

Guatemalan President Molina Perez didn’t say the “L” word at the UN. (wikimedia.org)

Outgoing Mexican President Felipe Calderon, who has presided over a drug war that has left more than 55,000 people dead during his six-year term, told the General Assembly the UN should lead “a profound international debate” about ways to reduce drug trafficking and its consequences. The UN itself should do more to intervene if wealthy Western countries that consume “tons and tons of drugs” cannot bring their demand down.

The US and other drug consuming countries need to “evaluate with all sincerity, and honesty, if they have the will to reduce the consumption of drugs in a substantive manner,” Calderon said. “If this consumption cannot be reduced, it is urgent that decisive actions be taken,” he added, without clarification.

Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos also called for a “frank, and without a doubt, global” discussion on alternatives to the status quo. “It is our duty to determine—on objective scientific bases—if we are doing the best we can or if there are better options to combat the scourge,” he  said.

There was speculation that Guatemalan President Otto Perez Molina would call for the legalization of the drug trade, as he has in the past, but he didn’t go that far in New York.

“We must seek new avenues with responsibility and perseverance, with the cooperation of all: producing, consuming and transit countries,” he said, adding that his government “would like to establish an international group of countries that are well disposed to reforming global policies on drugs” and would consider “new, creative and innovative alternatives.”

A concerted call for discussing alternatives to the drug war, yes. A clarion call for drug legalization, no, not yet.

Article republished from Stop the Drug War under Creative Commons Licensing